A reading edition

Organisms, viruses, and computers

What separates a living cell, a virus, and a computer.

Which functor is being used, what structure does it forget, and does it reflect equivalences?
Essay I, closing question

Contents

  1. Essay ISeparationAn (∞)-Topos-Theoretic Separation of Organisms, Viruses, and ComputersAutonomous closure, host-relative closure, and externally maintained machinery are distinct, and the functors that identify a virus with a program do not preserve the distinction.
    28 sections · 29 numbered results
  2. Essay IIOperadsOperadic Autopoiesis in an (∞)-ToposA cell is a requirement operad inside a least fixed point of endogenous production. A virus closes only after a homotopy pushout with a host. A computer, on the physical signature, does not close at all.
    60 sections · 36 numbered results
    1. 1Ambient (∞)-topos
    2. 2Internal (∞)-categories
    3. 3Internal symmetric monoidal (∞)-categories
    4. 4Open physical processes
    5. 5The process (∞)-operad
    6. 6Internal suboperads
    7. 7Systems as bounded operadic realizers
    8. 8Endogenous processes
    9. 9Organizational requirements
    10. 10Why one-step generation is not enough
    11. 11Production doctrine
    12. 12Recursive endogenous closure
    13. 13Operadic organizational closure
    14. 14Interpretation
    15. 15Equivalence of structured systems
    16. 16Fixed-point invariance
    17. 17Autopoiesis is invariant
    18. 18Interaction interfaces
    19. 19Operadic coupling
    20. 20Why the pushout is larger than the union
    21. 21Mixed trees
    22. 22Emergent causal capacity
    23. 23Coupled production
    24. 24Relative closure
    25. 25Strict host dependence
    26. 26The virus theorem
    27. 27The cell
    28. 28Virus and cell
    29. 29The computer
    30. 30Cell and computer
    31. 31Stronger than a list of parts
    32. 32Material typing
    33. 33The full physical invariant
    34. 34Why a virus and a program can look alike
    35. 35Non-conservativity
    36. 36The virus/program analogy
    37. 37Localization
    38. 38Simulation
    39. 39Locality
    40. 40Descent for closure
    41. 41Host coupling is not a change of context
    42. 42Three loci
    43. 43An important non-theorem
    44. 44A stratified invariant
    45. 45One invariant proves little
    46. 46A hierarchy of forgetful semantics
    47. 47Forgetfulness in general
    48. 48Main separation theorem
    49. 49What the equations say about a bacterium
    50. 50What the equations say about a virus
    51. 51What the equations say about a computer
    52. 52A sharper analogy, still not an equivalence
    53. 53Higher homotopies
    54. 54Robustness as homotopy
    55. 55Evolution as deformation
    56. 56Closure is scale-relative
    57. 57Enlarging the boundary
    58. 58Do not move the boundary in silence
    59. 59Relation to the autopoiesis problem
    60. 60Final formulation
    61. References
  3. Essay IIIThermodynamicsThermodynamically Sustained Autopoiesis in an (∞)-ToposLife-like autonomy is a least fixed point of feasible production together with a greatest fixed point of viable dynamics. Organizational closure is sustained by thermodynamic openness, not by isolation.
    60 sections · 24 numbered results
    1. 1The ambient physical (∞)-topos
    2. 2Open physical processes
    3. 3The cost object
    4. 4Thermodynamic valuation
    5. 5Sequential and parallel composition
    6. 6Nonequilibrium free energy
    7. 7Entropy production
    8. 8Exergy
    9. 9Thermodynamically feasible operations
    10. 10Budget-indexed operadic composition
    11. 11The thermodynamic production doctrine
    12. 12Thermodynamic organizational closure
    13. 13State objects
    14. 14The viability subobject
    15. 15Admissible controls
    16. 16The viability predecessor
    17. 17Monotonicity
    18. 18The viability kernel
    19. 19Two fixed points
    20. 20Thermodynamically sustained autopoiesis
    21. 21Why both fixed points are required
    22. 22Living systems are not thermodynamically closed
    23. 23Maintenance cost
    24. 24An energetic obstruction
    25. 25The cumulative form
    26. 26Isolation cannot pay the maintenance
    27. 27The operadic maintenance burden
    28. 28Flux and force
    29. 29Host coupling
    30. 30Cost of a mixed tree
    31. 31Two ways a host can help
    32. 32Viral thermodynamic dependence
    33. 33Coupling is not a free lunch
    34. 34Subsystem cost is not total cost
    35. 35Industrial coupling of computers
    36. 36The dependency analogy, and its limit
    37. 37The cell, thermodynamically
    38. 38The thermodynamic invariant
    39. 39Thermodynamic equivalence
    40. 40Invariance
    41. 41Thermodynamic separation
    42. 42The virus is a different object from the infected cell
    43. 43Changing the boundary changes the object
    44. 44No self-sufficiency claim without a boundary
    45. 45Feedstock is not machinery
    46. 46Two operads, not one pile of matter
    47. 47What a bacterium imports
    48. 48The ordinary computer has the opposite architecture
    49. 49The theory does not ban artificial life
    50. 50Autopoiesis does not classify up to equivalence
    51. 51Viability as a modality
    52. 52Localization and the kernel together
    53. 53A viability localization is not a physical equivalence
    54. 54A scale of equivalence
    55. 55The full invariant
    56. 56Full invariance
    57. 57Main separation theorem
    58. 58The diagram
    59. 59The defining equations
    60. 60Conclusion
    61. References

Reading map

I. Closure is an inequality of images. For each organizational mode, compare what the system requires with what processes inside the system produce. Matter and energy may still cross the boundary.

II. The same relation, lifted to an internal process operad. Autonomy means the requirement operad sits inside the least fixed point of production. A host is a homotopy pushout of operads, not a change of context.

III. The least fixed point must be thermodynamically feasible, and the viability kernel — the greatest fixed point of admissible dynamics — must be inhabited. Organizational closure and thermodynamic openness are one pattern, not a contradiction.

Notation

Ambient (∞)-topos of physical contexts.
Component types, the typing map, and material support.
Organizational signature, resource, demand, and endogenous production.
Images of demand and of endogenous production.
Closure in mode a, and closure after supplementation by H.
Internal colored (∞)-operad of open physical processes.
Endogenous process operad and organizational requirement operad.
Production doctrine and its least fixed point.
Coupling: homotopy pushout of endogenous operads along a common interface.
Thermodynamic cost quantale, valuation, and minimum cost of an operation.
Production restricted to thermodynamically feasible realizations.
State object, viability subobject, and viability operator.
Viability kernel: greatest fixed point of admissible dynamics.
Thermodynamically sustained autopoiesis, and minimal maintenance power.
Forgetful, dependency, and localization functors. None is assumed conservative.

Set in Source Serif. Mathematics set with KaTeX. Cross-references inside an essay are links.